The Beauty who's a Beastie: A "Maleficent" Review
Anybody else who was expecting
more from Maleficent?
Admittedly, I wasn’t my usual
self and I didn’t get to watch this much anticipated movie on the first day of
its screening, which is why I got to hear a lot of eager feedback from friends
who have seen the film before I did. The initial comments were “must-see!” and “it’s
a tear-jerker!” but really, I didn’t find anything special about it other than
it’s a fairytale retold with Angelina Jolie in it.
How do you describe someone who has a lot of horns? (wink wink) |
Two lands once existed which were so different from each other that it
was said that the only thing that could bring them together would be either a great
hero or a wicked villain. One was a kingdom of folks like you and me – humans
ruled by a King who were always envious of their neighbours. The other was a
land of magic called the Moors – where fairyfolk and enchanted creatures lived
peacefully, not needing a king but relying instead on their trust on each
other. One day the humans dared to venture further and managed to steal the
wings of Maleficent – the strongest of the fairies and protector of the Moors.
Enraged, Maleficent is now driven by vengeance, and laid a curse upon the newborn
baby of the new King, who she once loved but only reciprocated her feelings
with treachery.
Maleficent Trailer
I’ve mentioned in one of my earlier movie reviews that Hollywood seemed to be running out of creative juices and
just started recycling classic fairytales, adding some sort of twist on it to
make the idea look original. But seriously, retelling fairytales from a
different angle has become a trend lately that one couldn’t help but consider
that these are really just lazy ideas that are hopeful of translating into a
blockbuster. Snow White and the Huntsman, Hansel and Gretel, and Jack the Giant Slayer are some cases of fairytales retold by Hollywood, and now Maleficent was
added to the list. The idea of giving these bedtime stories a dark,
contemporary approach felt exciting at first, but Hollywood is now overdoing it
that I’m starting to get tired of these fairy tale remakes.
Ah. Camouflage. So that's what those horns are for. |
I wouldn’t have had a problem
with it if only the execution of the “retelling” was effectively done, just
like how Christopher Nolan repackaged Batman as The Dark Knight, or how he
transformed the psychology of the Joker from comical to maniacal. The problem
with these rehashed versions of classic fairytales is that they felt like they
were made different just for the sake of creating something different.
Maleficent for example, is being marketed as “Sleeping Beauty from the
perspective of the Villain”, which would have been good however, the movie
turned to be an entirely different story, only borrowing some elements from the
said fairytale.
"To that Bat-cave!...i mean, Moors!" |
But then of course, this is an
Angelina Jolie comeback movie, and her name on the movie poster should be
enough reason for you to consider this as your date night film. Admittedly, with
the wobbly plot and amateur SFX aside, Maleficent did have its highlights. Angelina
Jolie was so into the character that it becomes hard to imagine it being portrayed
by someone else. The rest of the lead cast also delivered good performances,
although none of them of course, upstaged Angelina, or the baby Aurora for that
matter. It has an appeal towards the kids and it is undoubtedly a family movie,
although I don’t know how the parents will explain to the kiddos why Aurora didn’t
seem to care that her daddy died a horrible death, or why she seemed to easily get
away with talking to strangers.
"Ooohhh...something pointy! Better touch it" |
I’ve heard there’s gonna be a
Cinderella movie next year. I wonder what kind of twisting they’ll do to that
one.
Maleficent Cast
Angelina Jolie as Maleficent
Sharlto Copley as King Stefan
Elle Fanning as Princess Aurora
Vivienne Jolie-Pitt
Sam Riley as Diaval
Brenton Thwaites as Phillip
Imelda Staunton as Knotgrass
Juno Temple as Thistlewit
Lesley Manville as Flittle
Kenneth Cranham as King Henry
Credits to the images and videos used in this post go to "Maleficent" and/or to their respective owners. I do not own these materials. No copyright infringement intended.
Geoffrey Ledesma
i agree.. there's nothing extraordinary about this film.. i dont know if it's just me-- i even felt sleepy while watching..or prolly i was not too young for this movie.
ReplyDeleteWell personally I thought I was too old for the movie..lol
DeleteI've read that it's not that great but what the hell, Angelina Jolie is Angelina Jolie. Haha. I think her being in this film is enough for me to watch it. Great review Geoffrey! :)
ReplyDeleteTrue, if there's anything that made me watch this film it's because it's Angelina Jolie taking the lead. Other than that, it doesn't feel as appealing.
DeleteI've seen it last Saturday and you're right, it's lacking something. I don't know what it is, but there's something missing. It resembles Frozen in a way too.. I think Disney is trying to change the "true love" thing nowadays by twisting their fairy tales. But then again, Angelina is so beautiful! It's the redeeming quality of this movie. Haha.
DeleteDisclaimer: I haven't seen the movie.
ReplyDeleteYour review is quite vague. One point you bring up, for example, is how "Hollywood seemed to be running out of creative juices and just started recycling classic fairytales, adding some sort of twist on it to make the idea look original" and yet in the next paragraph you state that "the movie turned to be an entirely different story, only borrowing some elements from the said fairytale." I am merely pointing this out to show that if the latter quote was true, then the former quote would be rendered false as the movie, if it does in fact turn out to be an entirely different story that only borrows elements from the original fairy tale, would not be a simple recycle with a twist.
To be clear, I am not contesting your point of view that Hollywood seems to be running out of original ideas and getting lazy. That's another discussion for another day.
I just want clarification on what I see as contradictory ideas that you have presented.